buy 100 mg buy 5mg buy australia buy cheap online buy from canada buy from mexico buy generic online buy legal online buy no script buy online buy online canada buy online cheap canada buy online cheap uk buy online in britain buy online in usa buy tablets buying from canada buy without prescription buying buying in the uk buying online safe can i order online canada canada cheap canada pharmacy canadian pharmacy cheap fast no rx cheap no prescription cheap rx without a prescreption cheap rx without prescription cheaper price for cheapest cheapest on the net cheapest price cost coupon offer express delivery fast delivery for sale for sale uk for sale without prescription from canada from england from usa get daily get from get online how can i obtain how can obtain how to buy how to get pills how to get prescription how to order legal canada legal uk legal usa low price lowest price mail order mail order canada mail order mexico medication mexican pharmacy no prescription no fees mexico pharmacies no prescription needed no prescription required obtain obtain fast delivery uk on line from canada on the internet online buying online ordering canada online pharmacy order no prescription order uk overnight overnight delivery pills for sale prescription free price price uk purchase purchasing purchasing in canada purchasing in uk refill your rx net saturday delivery shipped to australia shopping online pharmacy uk tablets to buy tabs toronto rx meds pill uk were can i buy in england where can i buy where to buy where to buy in canada where to get without prescription canada without prescription uk

a unique literary press

Noting Trends: An Account from the Slush Pile

In the past two weeks I have ingested around 1,200 novel pitches as a screener for a book contest. I’m a poet. I work to make small things do big things. So from the start I respect anyone willing to embark on a 50,000-plus-word adventure.

That said, a surprising number of entries were poorly written, chock full of cliches and stunted by grammatical errors. It’s hard to move past that kind of distraction. What struck me most, however, was not the continually repeated story patterns (there were many), but the way in which authors presented their manuscripts. I’d have to say around 70% were at least partially framed in the second person, gesturing very loudly toward me, the reader, as if to say: Like me! Relate to me! Publish me!

Some of my favorite novels out there offer characters who I don’t easily relate to immediately. I draw my connections from the situations the characters are placed in and how they maneuver through them. Sometimes this aligns with my own life experience and sometimes it gives me an experience outside of what I’ve known. I like to be surprised—both by “the shock of recognition” and by a discovery I had not considered. Beyond these small insights, though, it is good writing that draws me in. A strong voice and command of the language.

For these reasons, the second person framework feels like a cheap gimmick, immediately cheesy, only interested in ushering me through the door and less interested in having something worth sharing. It’s a hard game, though, trying to imagine the stranger that might be handling your dream.

I don’t mind being critical here for two reasons: first, I participate in the game of sending my precious work off to unknown hands all the time, and secondly, even with my hopes for publication, I expect editors to filter out the stuff that isn’t ready for print. Sure, there are some fine hairs to split in that last category, but that’s after you’ve weeded through the majority of what comes in.

Even though I’m not signing rejection slips here, this work makes the karmic circle a bit more complete. I don’t smile while saying “no.” But I’ll probably feel a bit lighter the next time rejection rolls my way. Which is, inevitably, going to be very soon.

Bookmark and Share

Leave a reply

Required

Required, hidden

XHTML Tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments